COURT WATCH

Misty Motion to Continue

The City is asking a Land Court judge to push back the September 15 Case Management Conference in Misty Mountain Shop LLC v. City of Malden — here's the plain-language breakdown.

On August 12, 2026, the Malden City Solicitor filed a document called a "Motion to Continue" in the lawsuit filed in Land Court on July 27 — Misty Mountain Shop LLC and Halona Mui v. City of Malden, City Council members, and DMS Trinity, LLC. For Malden residents and taxpayers, here is a straightforward breakdown of what this means.

What is being requested?

The City is asking the Land Court to postpone a scheduled meeting known as a "Case Management Conference." This is a procedural meeting where the judge and the lawyers set the timeline and rules for how the rest of the case will proceed.

When was it supposed to happen?

The meeting was originally set for Tuesday, September 15, 2026, at 9:30 a.m., before Hon. Diane R. Rubin — the same judge who ruled against the City in the earlier Benevolent Botanicals case.

Why the delay?

The City's lead lawyer, Solicitor Alicia A. McNeil, has a scheduling conflict. The motion states she has a previously scheduled appointment on that same day, made before the September 15 hearing date was set, and that she has made reasonable efforts to avoid the conflict — but her prior commitment prevents her from appearing before the Court that day.

The requested continuance is sought in good faith and is not requested for purpose of delay.

The proposed new plan

The motion asks the Court to move the Case Management Conference to "a date after September 30th" — pushing the case's procedural calendar into October.

What does this mean for the case?

This motion is a standard request to adjust the court's calendar. The City Solicitor notes the request is made in good faith and is not an attempt to unfairly stall the legal process. It does not change any of the substance of the case — it only resets when the judge and both sides sit down to set the rules for how the case will proceed.

The filings
  • Defendants' Motion to Continue, filed Aug. 12, 2026
    View PDF →
  • Notice of Appearance, filed Aug. 12, 2026
    View PDF →
Land Court docket for 26 MISC 000403, showing the Sept. 15, 2026 Case Management Conference and the Aug. 12 Motion to Continue
The Land Court docket for 26 MISC 000403, as of August 12, 2026.
Massachusetts court case search result for Misty Mountain Shop LLC, case 26 MISC 000403, status: Open
The case in the Commonwealth's public case-search system: still open, still on the Fast Track.

Continuing coverage

Reference

Malden's City Solicitor, Alicia A. McNeil, has made a return appearance in Land Court for the case "26 MISC 000403 Mui, Halona, et al. v. City of Malden, et al. RUBIN," also known as "Misty Mountain Shop LLC, and Halona Mui, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No.: 26 MISC000403, City of Malden; and Peg Crowe, Paul Condon, Amanda Linehan, Ryan O'Malley, Ari Taylor, Stephen Winslow, Chris Simonelli, Jadeane Sica, Michelle Luong, Karen Colón Hayes, and Carey McDonald, as Members of the City of Malden City Council; and DMS Trinity, LLC, Defendants."

A disclosure: AI assistance was used to organize, draft, and compose this story from source documents available at masscourts.org. Underlying reference documents are linked to for readers who want to review sources themselves.
This piece reflects our understanding of the matter as of publication and is not legal advice. If you believe we've gotten a fact wrong, please email MaldenNewsNetwork@gmail.com so we can look into it.